咱们结婚吧

SC delivers split verdict in Hijab case_我的网站

A |     New Delhi, Oct 13 (UNI) A two-judge bench of the Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a split verdict in the Hijab ban case, and referred the matter to the Chief Justice's (CJI) court for his direction to constitute a larger bench to decide the issue.

The bench of Justices Hemant Gupta and Sudhanshu Dhulia delivered the verdict on a batch of appeals against the Karnataka High Court judgment upholding the hijab ban in educational institutions.

"We have divergent of opinion, I have framed 11 questions on the issue," Justice Hemant Gupta who led the bench said in hiss verdict.

While dismissing the batch of appeals filed by many students, Justice Gupta affirmed the high court's order on the hijab ban and said, "the matter be sent to the CJI for constituting a larger bench to hear the case."

The two-judge bench on September 26, had reserved its order, after hearing from all the parties -- 23 petitioners, their lawyers, and the Karnataka government for a marathon 10 days.

The apex court pronounced the verdict on 23 petitions, including that of, Aishat Shifa, and others.

The state government has argued in the Supreme Court that it had the authority to issue an order to educational institutions to follow the discipline of wearing the prescribed school uniforms.

Senior advocate Dushyant Dave, appearing for the students/ petitioners, argued that fundamental rights, freedom to choose to what to wear and freedom of faith would not diminish inside a classroom.

The lawyers for the students -- Devadatt Kamat, Dr Rajeev Dhavan amd Dishyant Dave -- submitted in the top court that the Karnataka State government had not presented even a single shred of evidence to support their claim that a few students wearing hijab to their classrooms in addition to their respective uniforms violated public order, health and morality.

The lawyers further said that the Karnataka government had not provide any material to support their claim that wearing hijab infringed on the fundamental rights of other students.

A Full Bench of the Karnataka High Court comprising Chief Justice Ritu Raj Awasthi, Justice Krishna Dixit and Justice J M Khazi, in their judgement on March 15, this year, held that wearing of hijab by women was not an essential religious practice of Islam.

The high courts's three-judge bench, had dismissed the petitions filed by a group of Muslim girl students against PU government college for denying them entry while wearing Hijab.

The led by Chief Justice Awasthi dismissed the petition stating that the practice of hijab is not an essential practice under islam and thus does not fall within the ambit of Article 25 of the Constitution of India.

The High court had also held that prescription of school uniform is only a reasonable restriction which is constitutionally permissible which the students cannot object to and stated that the government had the power to issue such notification and that no case was made out against the government notification.

UNI SM ING。

B |     现年71岁的著名导演王晶，近年积极转战网络，开设YouTube频道《王晶笑看江湖》大爆娱乐圈秘闻，吸引大量网友追看。在上月播出的一集节目中，王晶回顾完香港喜剧发展史后，突然一脸认真地宣布停播消息：“我在将近几个月内，工作会非常繁忙，而且身体也不太好，所以节目会暂停一段日子。”当时不少网友发现他在节目中全程不断用力眨眼，显得非常吃力，纷纷担心是否为中风前兆。不过，王晶最新近照日前曝光——虽然身形明显消瘦，但精神状态看起来依然不错。

C | 尽管宣布暂停幕前工作休养身体，王晶的近况终于有了消息。曾为TVB艺人、近年转型为网红的女儿王海榛（前艺名王子涵），8月23日在Instagram上分享了一家四口为妈妈丁德君庆祝生日的合照。照片中，站立合影的王晶身材比以往明显消瘦不少，连标志性的大肚腩也小了一圈。对比2023年一家人庆祝母亲节时的旧照，当时王晶面部圆润，与近照相比确实清瘦了许多。不过，照片中的他笑容满面，精神状态看起来相当不错。

D | 其实针对眨眼问题，王晶去年曾亲自拍视频解释，称自己长期受严重的干眼症困扰。他坦言找过多位眼科医生都无法根治，形容这是“不治之症”：“从小到大都这样，后来好了一阵子，但一累又复发了，所以我索性放弃了，习惯了。”只要身体疲惫，眼干情况就会发作，他希望大家不要过于担心。

Current article:http://e6c8.qixicuorenchouzuan.buzz/list_1k5omn/h4lion.html

Published on:00:00:00